dragonlady7: self-portrait but it's mostly the DSLR in my hands in the mirror (Default)

via https://ift.tt/3q9evoI

s-leary reblogged your post next installment: Innermost Depths https://s-leary.tumblr.com/post/672783672574967808/next-installment-innermost-depths and added

It was really the same feeling as watching the first ~15 minutes of The Last Jedi and going, “… did they hire B to write this?” before it all went downhill.

OMGGGG i’m just glad there wasn’t a moment like when in my thing I’d had Poe be like “and everyone thinks I’m a spice runner because racism!” and everyone in the story being horrified and then

they made him a spice runner in TLJ

i don’t think i will ever recover from that.

like, i’m not good at not being racist, I am a fumbling buffoon raised absolutely steeping in this racist society and I just do my best where I can, right, and even I was like “oh man it’d be really fucked up if–”

and then they did that, a multibillion-dollar company with presumable access to any sensitivity readers they could ever want

I have officially seen all of S2 of the Witcher, and while about 25% of it is bafflingly irritating to me (WHYY) and a further like 20% is just confusing to me (elf piss anon???) and an additional 5% of it is like actively wildly upsetting (SCREECH and yeah no they don’t really get a free pass on racism either BOy hoWDY), probably the full remaining 50% was delightful, so Witcher has officially passed the tests that MCU and Star Wars failed, and I get to not only stick around but actually be able to enjoy the new fandom content.

I was just going through my blog from two years ago when I first got into this fandom and I still feel good about it in the same ways, so.

I have avoided discussing spoilers so far on this blog, for selfish reasons, because I hadn’t seen the whole thing, but I finally did last week so I will probably start talking about things soon and forgetting to tag. Please care for yourselves and all, I know it’s crazy how fast people start posting spoilers but I’m just not a person who cares about spoilers and I just don’t have the space in my head to hold for that for much longer. So. Soon I’ll maybe talk about the things I loved and hated specifically in this season and I’ll probably just have the regular “the witcher” tag on it– but I also feel like if you’re a person who cares about spoilers and wants to watch this thing you probably have done so. (Your picture was not posted)

dragonlady7: self-portrait but it's mostly the DSLR in my hands in the mirror (Default)
via http://bit.ly/2GFD5bW

ms-demeanor:

systlin:

kawuli:

This person is my new best friend

Farming systems need to fit into their natural and social environment. Sometimes we describe this as a socio-ecological niche.

Caption; 

In a minute.

So, taking it that you said you live in Arizona and “your family has a farm in Chihuahua,” A quick congratulations are in order. You’re an absentee landowner! You’re right at the peak of farming’s social pyramid. Living the dream.

So you probably don’t participate in the day-to-day management, you just collect checks. Pretty common situation for absentee landlords. From that distance, it’s understandable that you have a poor grasp on water, land, and how they play out in various types of agriculture.

But let’s take a step back.

Lots of cultures have used low or no meat diets. The Ganges valley, ancient Egypt, China, much of early Europe, ect.

Notice anything in common there?

They’re all very, very wet. Plants that are edible for humans grow readily.

They also had intense hierarchies where elites could just tell the lower classes they weren’t allowed to eat meat-whether via religious teachings, custom, or just straight-up economic exploitation to where animal protein was unattainable. But that’s a whole different discussion.

On the other hand, lots of cultures have used mostly or all animal diets.

E.G. The Bedouin, Mongols, Maasai, Inuit, ect.

What do these have in common? They’re in places that are either very dry or very cold. Either the plants that grow are very sparse & tough, or none at all.

Humans can only digest specific types of plant matter. We need tender stems, leaves & fruit; enlarged seeds, or energy storing roots.

The entire rest of the plant is inedible for us. Stalk, branch, dry leaves, ect.

And without intense irrigation, the only plants that grow in dry areas are entirely made of things that humans can’t digest. They’re almost entirely cellulose. Tough stalks, fibrous leaves covered in wax and hair, thorns, ect.

That’s why we call these areas ‘scrub’. The only use humans can make of the natural vegetation is to scrub pots.

But…cows, sheep, goats, horses, bison, deer, camels & other ruminants can digest all of it.

That’s what those 3 and 4 chambered stomachs are for. These animals GI tracts are fermentation chambers full of microflora that break long, tough cellulose molecules down into sugars and fatty acids that the cow can use.

We can’t do that. We eat straw, we just poop out straw.

That’s why people living in deserts, scrub & dry grasslands aren’t vegetarian. They’d starve. They kept close to the animals that can digest what grows there; ruminants.

(The oceanic food chain that Inuit & other maritime peoples are looped into is a whole ‘nother discussion.)

Failure to recognize the role of local environment in diet is a major oversight in the vegetarian community at large, so again, no personal blame here.

Traditional vegetarian societies are trotted out to showcase that low/no meat diets are possible. But it’s done w/o recognition as to why ‘those particular’ societies did it, and others did not.

Paying attention to local environment is a huge part of sustainability, and yet sustainability movements don’t always do so well at that.

We can also fall short by failing to recognize that for dry regions, the bottleneck in productivity isn’t land, it’s water.

As an absentee landowner, you may or may not be aware of how much irrigation water it takes to grow vegetables in a desert. Math time.

Let’s start w. cows. Best figures for cow carrying capacity in landscape similar to Chihuahua are for dry part of CO. Double that for Chihuahua’s longer growing season, and 10 cows would need about 73 acres to live on (wild scrub w no irrigation.)

Cool, so we don’t have to irrigate to feed those cows. All we have to do is give them drinking water. How much? A cow needs about 18.5 gal/day, so 10 of them for a year would need about 67,000 gallons.

67,000 gallons is a decent amount of water.

Now let’s look at how much it takes to grow vegetables on that same land.

Most plant crops need about an acre-inch of water per week.

For the non-farmers and absentee landlords following along, an acre-inch is just how much water it takes to cover an acre of land 1” deep.

It’s about 27,000 gallons.

An acre of crops needs that every single week.

Chihuahua’s got this amazing long growing season. So let’s say a veggie, grain, soybean or other plant protein farm in Chihuahua’s got crops in the ground 40 weeks out of the year.

73 acres x 40 weeks x 27,000 gallons/week = 79 MILLION gallons of water.

That’s a thousand times more water.

It takes a thousand times more water to grow an acre of crops for human consumption, than it takes to grow an acre of cow on wild range.

Again, as an absentee farm owner you may or may not be aware already. But for audience at home, most of Chihuahua’s irrigation water comes from the Rio Conchos.

The river’s drying up so hard that it’s the subject of a dedicated WWF preservation project.

“But that’s not a fair comparison. An acre of crops can feed 10x as many people as an acre of cattle.”

Exactly. A crop-only diet can feed 10x as many people. But it takes 1000x as much water.

In places where there’s limited land and a surplus of water, it makes a lot of sense to optimize for land, so there, grow & eat crops.

And in places where there’s a lot of land and limited water, it makes sense to optimize for water, So there, grow & eat ruminants.

It’s really interesting to me that the conversation around vegetarianism & the environment is so strongly centered on assumptions that every place in the world is on the limited land/surplus plan.

You know what region that describes really well? Northwestern Europe.

In many ways, viewing low/no meat diets as the One True Sustainable Way is very much a vestige of colonialism. It found a farmway that works really well in NW Europe, assumed it must be universal, and tries to apply it to places where it absolutely does not pencil out.

Sarah Taber does a farming podcast called Farm to Taber where she talks a lot about a lot of issues facing modern farms and farming techniques and she’s endlessly fascinating and I adore her:

https://soundcloud.com/farm-to-taber-podcast
(Your picture was not posted)

Profile

dragonlady7: self-portrait but it's mostly the DSLR in my hands in the mirror (Default)
dragonlady7

January 2024

S M T W T F S
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 2627
28293031   

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 6th, 2025 05:32 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios