(no subject)
Mar. 19th, 2002 01:22 pmaw.
Max called me.
(because i called and sniffled into his voicemail last night. i'm awful that way.)
he's doing fine, enjoying himself, sending out many postcards, and he's at the Grand Canyon now.
he's pondering the possibility of a trip up to UR for D-Day.
that would be quite nice.
Max called me.
(because i called and sniffled into his voicemail last night. i'm awful that way.)
he's doing fine, enjoying himself, sending out many postcards, and he's at the Grand Canyon now.
he's pondering the possibility of a trip up to UR for D-Day.
that would be quite nice.
no subject
Date: 2002-03-19 11:29 am (UTC)is that horrible that i don't know? where's yosemite? and yellowstone? i know nothing.
Re:
Date: 2002-03-19 11:36 am (UTC)yosemite nat'l monument= oregon?
yellowstone park: i don't know. pacific northwest somewhere.
i also am a retard and obviously need to drive across the country and see what's to be seen.
yup yup.
Re:
Date: 2002-03-20 06:17 am (UTC)but i want to travel with money.
i want to stay in nice hotels and buy stupid useless souvenirs.
Re:
Date: 2002-03-20 06:59 am (UTC)Even the cheapest hostels in Scotland were clean, you just had to sleep in a bunk in a big room full of bunks, so you met all kinds of strangers. (I usually specified female-only rooms, unless I was traveling with a boy and wanted the group to stay together... I don't know that I was ever traveling with a boy though, so what am I thinking of? Who knows. But anyhow, I rather liked taking buses everywhere and feeling as if I were "roughing it" (the beds were just as comfy as a motel...)
aw, now i'm lonesome.
Re:
Date: 2002-03-20 07:37 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2002-03-20 02:07 pm (UTC)funnier still, his companion...
Re:
Date: 2002-03-20 03:56 pm (UTC)he told me las vegas was entertaining. he and his buddy were thinking they should visit a brothel because it was legal, but... then again, no. Hee.
i guess he's made it through Arizona now? this would be so much easier if he'd just update his livejournal himself...
;p
Re:
Date: 2002-03-20 04:08 pm (UTC)Re:
Date: 2002-03-20 04:16 pm (UTC)i am consistently disappointed. I wanted more geek for my money.
since i didn't pay him anything, i suppose i got what i paid for.
he's sort of geeky. sometimes. i guess. And he knows marginally more JavaScript than me. So I guess he gets to keep his title.
but it would help if he were more fanatically wired!
:)
Re:
Date: 2002-03-21 05:47 am (UTC)Re:
Date: 2002-03-21 06:27 am (UTC)and he MUDS.
...
really what I want is fanatical devotion to email. But that's just greedy. He's plenty geek.
Re:
Date: 2002-03-21 08:46 am (UTC)noticed the geek.
wonder how they're gonna break him in the Air Force...
Re:
Date: 2002-03-21 08:48 am (UTC)though if you've ever seen him play ultimate frisbee, you're not really worried. he's a beast.
Re:
Date: 2002-03-21 09:57 am (UTC)wiry little bastard, very deceptive...