This was composed as a comment in response to
kittyc1978's
post of a couple hours ago, weherein she responded with distress to my earlier posts linking to Osama Bin Laden's video's transcript and translation / analysis. But it was too long, and didn't fit, and I didn't want to post it in her journal after all. So it's here.
Hmm... I must say, the speech struck me in a very different way.
Don't take any of this in the wrong way! Your feelings and response are valid! I am simply presenting mine because they are different and may be interesting to you. if it's just going to make you mad, don't read! The following are just my feelings and my response and my reasoning.
First off I was indignant that he should say this now-- I mean, he killed over 2000 people in New York City, the densest blue patch of blue in the overwhelmingly blue state of NY. The fact that he's pretty much admitting he did so because he personally objects to George W. Bush is pretty fucking rich. Sure,
now you get political, you bastard. When it suits you.
It angered me a great deal, and I was glad I had already cast my vote (via absentee ballot) so that I could not claim to have been influenced by it all in any way. But, it also was extremely interesting to me, and gave me a great deal of very sobering food for thought. I mean, what an opportunity-- if you think of it this way, he
explained himself. To all of those who cried out, "WHY?" on September 11th (I know I screamed that word at one point on that day, as I stood wrapped in my towel staring at the TV set (it being 9 in the morning and I being a college student, I had not yet begun my day)---- here is an ANSWER, which in itself must mean something.
And so I found that reading it with something other than indignation proved to be an interesting exercise, at the least.
My boyfriend recently engaged in a lengthy argument via e-mail with one of his professors, who demanded to know how anyone in his right mind could vote against Bush. My boyfriend responded that he didn't see how anyone in his right mind could vote
for Bush.
Instead of just being idiots and sniping at each other, they then proceeded to discuss current events-- mostly, those warehouses full of missing explosives, which went missing after the US occupied Iraq, and the like. (They were WMD's, no they weren't, they were missing before!, no they weren't, the world is safer now, no it isn't., etc, all done in Dave's inimitably reasonable style, and far better-written than anything I've ever done.)
What it finally came down to, once they had no more to argue about, was that
a vote for Bush was a vote against the U.N. and America's heavy involvement, even (some might say) subservience to foreign powers, a vote for Us Against The World, self-reliant and powerful and isolated.
A vote against Bush is a vote for the U.N., for America's involvement in the affairs of foreign powers as something other than A Superpower.
Given this line of reasoning, Osama (and some far,
far more reasonable people, many of my family and friends included-- horrible as it is to find oneself agreeing with evil incarnate) feel that a vote for Bush is in essence a "fuck you" to the rest of the world. I might point out that on the 12th of September, the entire world was shocked and horrified and poured out sympathy for the US.
That position has reversed to the point where my best friend in London no longer speaks to me because she can't stand to think about what her government has done in the name of old alliances.
The world is very small.
Can we really afford to exercise our freedom in a vacuum? Can we really say, "I must vote for who I think best, without [bowing to pressures from / taking into consideration]* the rest of the world" ? *due to human nature, which of those phrases you think fits there will be determined by how you already feel about the issue. That's human nature. There is no right or wrong choice there.
Because the fact remains, we
did bomb those apartment towers in Lebanon, with women and children in them. It
did happen, although not as he says it did.
There was nothing I hated more in high school than "revisionists" having their way with American history, and I happily spent many a class period beating down these people with my vastly superior logic and grasp of American history. I believe that this country has, for the most part, upheld the ideals upon which it was founded.
But we have made mistakes. Everyone makes mistakes. Properly, the entire Israel/Pakistan crisis can be traced right to English mismanagement of conquered land. We are far less tarnished by colonialism than the earlier European superpowers.
But we inherited their messes, and now
we are the last remaining superpower.
Our mistakes reach an unprecedented number of people.I would therefore say that we cannot afford to exercise our freedom in our traditional isolation. We cannot bow to threats, no, but we have to make our decisions more responsibly than we have. Most of the evil done by the US has been done when we have leapt into situations saying "we must do something!" but, given our traditional isolationism, we don't understand the situation. This was brought home heartbreakingly to me by my history classes in college (particularly an awful African one that made me want to die), and more immediately by the tales my father told of Vietnam and its aftermath, and by the simple inability of my sister to explain where she is being deployed and why.
And so I made my decision to vote against Bush because I don't feel that he is interested enough in understanding the situation, and I feel that we
must pay more attention to the rest of the world. The world is too unstable, and not big enough anymore.
I made that decision before this tape was released.
But I stick by it just as strongly after this tape was released.
Osama is trying to play the "reason" card and gain the sympathy of the rest of the world. We mustn't let him do that. We mustn't defy the rest of the world. We are tied to the rest of the world. My Norwegian cousin (the one who isn't an American citizen) is being sent to Afghanistan because of his country's involvement in NATO: the decisions of the US affect the rest of the world VERY concretely. The world is tiny and interconnected and we cannot continue as we have been.
There. I am sorry for going on so long and with such passion, but I had to put the thoughts down somewhere, and make an answer as best I could with the different viewpoint I have of the situation. Again, don't take offense. Your feelings are valid. The above are simply my feelings.