discussions, good reading even if not OFMD fan, pan-fandom applicable
via https://ift.tt/cu3Z5RT
chuplayswithfire
https://chuplayswithfire.tumblr.com/post/695762477461405696/so-like-fandom-has-a-racism-problem-yeah-thats
:
So like, fandom has a racism problem, yeah. That’s not a surprise. Fandom’s
just a microcosm of the rest of society, and society’s got a racism
problem. But the more I look across content, the more I’ve started to
realize people don’t seem to understand why racism is…. a problem.
And that makes it harder for people to see racism, when they don’t
really… understand why and how it’s a problem. I’ve been thinking about
this for the last day, and so I’m making this post today because I finally
had a chance to sit and put my thoughts together in a way that I hope will
make sense.
Because here’s the thing. I’ve been getting… more and more the idea that
people think racism is a problem because it makes people feel bad. That
Jim stabbed that British officer because calling Frenchie a slave was an
insult that hurt Frenchie’s feelings. That Ed had the French captain
skinned and thrown overboard because calling Ed a donkey hurt his feelings.
That the ship full of aristocrats were jerks because they hurt Ed’s
feelings.
And like. Yeah, I mean, on a very surface level, their feelings were hurt,
sure, those were shit things to experience. But it’s not about their
feelings, first and foremost. Racism isn’t about making people feel bad.
Those things weren’t bad just because they were especially shit insults.
Racism is about making structural oppression. It’s about making people
less - not making them feel less, but legally, socially, morally,
literally, less than. It’s about establishing “this is a person, and that
is not a person”. It’s about society wide depersonalization. And in the
context of OFMD especially, it’s about whiteness and colonization, and
the way that racism is the socially created and legally enforced system
through which whiteness decides who counts and who doesn’t. Who is a person
and who is a thing.
Slaves and donkeys? These are things. These are items to be bought and
traded and sold and put down and compensated for the loss. They are not
people with rights and freedoms and protections, they are line items on
someone’s accounting sheet, objects with monetary value pre-determined and
understood.
Frenchie isn’t called a slave because that British officer (yeah, I’m not
learning his name, not sorry) felt like being an ass or wanted to make him
feel bad. He called Frenchie a slave because he was furious that some
thing, some object, some less than creature, was speaking to him as if
they could have even the faintest hope of being on the same playing field,
let alone equally human. He was declaring Frenchie an object and a tool
that should be silent unless spoken to.
That’s why Jim throws that knife at him. That’s why Jim is pissed enough to
blow their cover even with a fuck-off huge warship right next to them.
Because everyone on the ship knows exactly what being a slave would make
Frenchie. And Jim especially has reason to be aware of and sensitive to
that, given that Jim is in love with a Black man who’s already been being
demeaned, dismissed, and disdained through this whole encounter.
Those British officers get their shit wrecked because they’re declaring
people the crew loves to be less than they are, less than human, reminding
them all that in the world outside of piracy Frenchie, Oluwande, and Roach
aren’t people but property. Objects. And that shit’s not fucking
acceptable.
This logic directly follows through with the French captain Ed has killed -
which, let’s be clear, that French captain was definitely going to be
killed no matter what, because this is a pirate raid and if they
massacred what seemed to be a majority of the crew already, there’s little
chance they’ll leave the dickbag captain alive behind them. So this isn’t a
man who got killed because he was a racist fucking dick.
This is a man who got himself a worse death being a racist fucking dick.
The scene plays out in a very similar way as the previous dickbag racist to
get got, except in this case, there’s no Jim to to take control of the
situation (Stede is not able particularly helpful here because of his own
implicit biases that he’s yet to unpack), there’s just Ed and Fang here to
react to this situation.
And the situation is - the French Captain being a racist, and specifically
choosing to focus on being a racist to Ed rather than just being
generally anti-pirate. I’d thought that was pretty clear until I came
across the sentiment that Ed is lashing out here because his “feelings were
hurt” rather than because he was responding to racist bigotry, so let’s be
blunt about that.
Stede starts the interaction with a characteristically bitchy remark about
how there’s a distinct lack of saucier spoons on this “supposedly first
class vessel”, but when the French captain throws out, “my apologies…
hadn’t imagined we’d be hosting your kind”, the meaning of that statement
goes right over Stede’s head. He registers insult, sure, but the way Ed
stills there? The way he closes his eyes and then turns and requests
clarification in a way that is clearly meant to give this asshole a chance
correct his mistake?
That’s Ed identifying what Stede missed. That when the French captain
says your
kind he’s not referring to pirates. And that’s made clear by the fact that
when he continues on, he doesn’t direct his response to Ed And Stede, he
directs it to Ed specifically.
“A rich donkey is still a donkey.”
That’s the French captain doing what the British officer did. Naming Ed for
an object, a beast of burden, a thing that is not worthy of recognition or
respect or acknowledgement. Ed’s Blackbeard and yet as far as this
asshole is concerned, by the very fact that he’s not white nothing he’s
ever accomplished, not the fear he inspires or the legend he’s built,
matters in the face of that.
That’s what racism is about.
It’s about whiteness establishing that the most successful, the most
fearsome, the most legendary of all pirates is an indigenous man and that
makes him worth less than any white man. He’s got this captain’s life in
his hands, and even that can’t make the man treat Ed with a crumb of
caution or respect. He’s not a person to that French man. He’s an upstart,
an animal stepping out of line.
And honestly, I think too many people think Stede’s reaction was the right
one. Because it wasn’t. At all.
Stede’s not helpful here, I mentioned earlier, because he’s got his own
implicit bias acting as baggage. When Ed expresses his absolute fury at
this man calling him a donkey, a beast of burden, an animal, even though he
doesn’t know nothing about Ed, Stede’s response - is to try and stop the
anger, rather than address the source of it. “Don’t debase yourself for a
man who doesn’t have a single tureen on board.”
knowlesian
https://tmblr.co/mv29yssej8nmioau-5ig0cg has written some great meta on
the subject of this response, but to put it simply - Ed also doesn’t have
a tureen on his ship, Stede, and there’s nothing debasing in a natural and
normal anger response.
Someone labels you an animal, a beast, a creature, you should get angry.
They should get cussed the fuck out. Especially because again, it’s not
unique. The French captain is very effectively reminding Ed that the
greater society, the world, will never see him as a full person, deserving
of respect and acknowledgement, no matter what he has or how he carries
himself or what he accomplishes. It’s foreshadowing how the party will go -
to the white world, Ed will always be a novelty at best, a disobedient
animal at worst.
Lashing out at that, especially with words, isn’t debasing yourself.
And honestly, that guy getting thrown overboard? And skinned? (Though
really, it’s up in the air as to whether Fang actually bothered with that.)
That’s a power fantasy for so many of us fans of color, lmao, the idea that
god, one of the fucked up assholes out here doing their level to remind us
that the world does not see us as full and equal people, gets to suffer and
die.
It’s not because his feelings were hurt. It’s because just like the British
officers, this man is reminding Ed and the audience that the structural
power of racism is such that you can never win within the system of it,
because the system is built to keep us out, keep us down, keep us pinned.
Stede’s reaction makes sense, because he’s part of that system too - he’s
been born and raised in it, in the respectability politics, in the genteel
illusion that the upperclass way of doing things, where you direct the
initial response to the person reacting too loud, too public, showing all
that messy, uncouth emotion rather than the person who’s actually the
problem. You look at the response rather than the source.
And Stede, to his credit, isn’t trying to shut Ed up. He’s trying, in his
own way, to be helpful, actually!
But Stede doesn’t know what it’s like, to be considered not a person. As a
white gay man who everyone has been able to clock as gay his entire life,
he’s been treated as lesser than and wrong and disgusting his entire life,
by his father and his peers, but he’s till a rich, land-owning white man.
That makes him a person, even if a despised, rejected, undesired one. His
society sees him as a person, someone who could even, theoretically,
plausibly, be treated with respect if he could just behave according to
their rules.
That’s not an opportunity you can have, with racism. It’s one of the
underlying differences in homophobia and racism that I’ve personally felt,
as someone who’s experienced both. With homophobia, what you are is wrong
but the expectation is that you can, should, and must, act “right”,
behavior “appropriately” and then you can fit in. At the bottom of the
pack, but in. With racism, you’re always out. You can’t change your race.
You can’t change what you’re identified as on sight. You can’t do anything
to overcome what you are, and that’s why you’re treated as and understood
to be less than.
And in this time period, that’s very much a legal standing, far more
overtly than it is in 2022. Black people aren’t people, in 1717, they’re
property or soon to be property or creatures without real intelligence who
need to be minded by their betters. Indigenous people aren’t people,
they’re savage animals who need to be minded by their betters, uneducated,
uncontrolled.
The response to the British, and the French, and later to those
aristocrats, is appropriate in this world, because this is a world that
does in fact, cater a bit to that fantasy - what if some people got what
they deserved, sometimes? What if it was in fact, the right thing, to fuck
up a racist? The internet loves to talk about punching Nazis and TERFs, as
they should, but the same goes for a racist too. These guys are reinforcing
a corrupt, horrific system of abuse, and they get what they deserve.
I’m sure this won’t reach many people. But if you read this post, I hope
you think about what racism is, and how it works, and understand that it’s
not about the individual at all. It’s about the system at play and how that
system dehumanizes and minimizes and objectifies whole classes of people
for the sake of uplifting a single race and making everyone else into
objects and novelties and creatures rather than people.
Next time you see someone say Ed “had his feelings hurt” by the French
captain, or imply that the British navy were “rude” to Frenchie, Oluwande,
and Roach, remind them that they weren’t fucking rude, feelings weren’t
hurt, they were being actively dehumanized in accordance with an
overarching system of widespread oppression.
Breaking fandom containment because whether you’re a fan of OFMD or not,
whether you even know who these characters are, this is a really excellent
thing to be reminded of, and I recommend the essay even if you are not
familiar with the characters.
(Your picture was not posted)