meanderings0ul replied to your post
Sep. 25th, 2019 12:05 pmvia https://ift.tt/2ltO4vq
meanderings0ul replied to your post “meanderings0ul replied to your post “Reusable Bulk Containers” …”
Thank you for clarifying. About the only thing the US does a consistently good job at recycling is steel. It’s very frustrating that a lot of formally recycled materials end up in the landfill, but if the city is getting official credit for their recycling program it has to be buried in a specific part of the landfill where it could technically be retrieved for reprocessing at a later date. It’s a paltry excuse for a system in most places, but usership is how cities
…get funding for better recycling infrastructure, so it doesn’t work well so don’t bother was just not a good vibe for me. The international garbage fiasco is a whole nother layer, but how cities actually deal with this stuff is part of rl job, so I had to ask….
Ah, this is good information!! See, I didn’t know all that, and was just feeling glum, but instinctively thinking well, I still better keep recycling. So!!! Even if your municipality isn’t properly recycling things, it’s still worth keeping in the habit of separating everything. I just think it behooves us to reduce use as a first step.
I just wish there was more transparency and information about this, because for example at the farm we collect recyclables and trash and take them to the town transfer station ourselves but if we were informed and could determine that they’re putting recyclables in the landfill, we’d compost the paper, etcetera. (It would require us to do some rearrangement of our compost, but like. We’ve got the capacity. We’re just not going to do it if there’s a better place for paper to go. But if it’s not really going to that better place… well…)
meanderings0ul replied to your post “meanderings0ul replied to your post “Reusable Bulk Containers” …”
Thank you for clarifying. About the only thing the US does a consistently good job at recycling is steel. It’s very frustrating that a lot of formally recycled materials end up in the landfill, but if the city is getting official credit for their recycling program it has to be buried in a specific part of the landfill where it could technically be retrieved for reprocessing at a later date. It’s a paltry excuse for a system in most places, but usership is how cities
…get funding for better recycling infrastructure, so it doesn’t work well so don’t bother was just not a good vibe for me. The international garbage fiasco is a whole nother layer, but how cities actually deal with this stuff is part of rl job, so I had to ask….
Ah, this is good information!! See, I didn’t know all that, and was just feeling glum, but instinctively thinking well, I still better keep recycling. So!!! Even if your municipality isn’t properly recycling things, it’s still worth keeping in the habit of separating everything. I just think it behooves us to reduce use as a first step.
I just wish there was more transparency and information about this, because for example at the farm we collect recyclables and trash and take them to the town transfer station ourselves but if we were informed and could determine that they’re putting recyclables in the landfill, we’d compost the paper, etcetera. (It would require us to do some rearrangement of our compost, but like. We’ve got the capacity. We’re just not going to do it if there’s a better place for paper to go. But if it’s not really going to that better place… well…)